90 % of porn is boring

Internet is for porn. Internet offer you great many things than porn. You can name anything that you want to find on Google. But there is definitively a lot more porn on internet now than ten years ago.

In the early beginning, we boys looked for dirty pictures. Now, we can stream videos without paying for them. There are unbelievable amounts of videos and pictures that are "free of charge". At this point, I think I get damaged in some way? It can't be healthy to watch porn? There is no truth in porn. Why do I need porn, really?

I watch porn for my imagination and curiosity. Like I tend(ed) to fall in love (with more or less pretty girls I don't know), I need to trick or blind myself to get excited. Imagination is strengthening my natural arousal. That brings me greater pleasure. And I am damn pretty good about pleasuring myself. I just need some kind of inspiration for my brain to keep it going. In fact, I don't need porn. I can just use my imagination, like I did before. But porn may give faster arousal.

I can't any longer get excited over "normal" porn. I get very quickly bored. Almost all porn is boring to watch. That's because I have the feeling that I have seen things before. I know what happens. I know that an hour long porn video may take 3 days to shoot. I know that I just look at meaningless pumping, screaming or sucking action. Professionals don't arouse me. No!

I rather like real amateur porn videos. Once I have seen a new footage, I normally don't watch it a second time. Therefore, I never store porn on my hard disc. So, I must look for more if I want to keep my curiosity for porn.

I also think porn is damaging. If I am lucky spending quality time with a girl, I can't just tell her to bend over. Nor suck on her toes and breasts, lick her clitoris, nor run fingers into her vagina. That's not quite how thing will work well for both parts, I guess. Porn creates myths that we shouldn't respond to.

Female ski jumper landed badly

Anette Sagen, a front figure for female ski jumping, landed badly during test trials at Vikersund (Norway). She managed to fly 177 meter when the accident occured. Anette Sagen was sent directly to hospital. She hurt ankle and lower leg. Lucky for her it wasn't very serious, and she will be able to jump again in a few days.



Skeptics to female ski jumping may think this message supports that females don't belong in big hills. Today, female ski jumpers can only compete in 90 meter hills. But if it hadn't been for the fall, she would have improved her personal record. The fall is very typical, but not typical for women. Recently, the austrian Gregor Schlierenzauer, fell both in first and second jump during team competition in the same hill.



Both Sagen and Schlierenzauer are great ski jumpers!

Help women with child care!

What can I say about Womans Day? It's important to give women better rights everywhere in the world. It's proven that women spend more money on family, if they control family economy. Children will grow stronger with better nutrition and education. The position of the woman should be strengthened because it turns to be better for society. There is no reason to stick to old traditions and unfavourable views that suppress women. The most important thing is that womens income should be equal to mens income. That's because economy (resources) is the key to most the difficult situations, like war. Give therefore more power to women!



Women in Scandinavia are very lucky today. The Womens Day isn't that important to us scandinavians anymore. Nevertheless, women don't get equally paid for the same work position. E.g. female nurses get only 80 % of mens salary in Norway today. Females are not well represented in top positions either. Womens birth is the turning point in both cases. People expect that women must handle both childcare and management at the same time. And women get less paid as soon as they leave of absence. So, one of the solutions to this is to let fathers baby sit more.

Do not think that men can't handle childcare! The future is brighter through the females.

What's worse than both the climate crisis and the financial crisis?

From the point of view of Per Willy Amundsen, a Norwegian politican, apparently nothing is worse than the future immigration. He represents a party that demands to stop the immigration, especially muslims, because they worry about the future integration and increasing amounts of "parasites". The statements of P. Willy is quite shocking to me. Now, the global financial crisis strikes our small and open economy with great force. The result is fast increasing unemployment. And the climate crisis will require heavy investments in the future to avoid very serious global changes. Unfortunately, both come at the same time.



On second thought, the statement isn't that shocking after all. That is because his party (Fremskrittspartiet) wants to leave the control to the market forces. Profit is most desireable for them. And global warming, which isn't especially profitable, is actually out of the question. They deny the claims of global warming, unlike the other parties in Norway. And the financial crisis problably isn't that bad either, because they believe in the market. What cannot the market handle? (Is there any kind of lord that controls the economy?) The global warming and the financial crisis isn't a problem after all.

Fortunately for us, Norway have good regulations of the market, oil and other great resources to meet these challenges. What ever we do, there is always an alternative to buy us free. But we seem to not handle integration. Of course, both foreigners and the ethnic Norwegians are involved in this soup. The main reason that immigration take place is the need for employees. And for a second reason, love is crossing borders. Therefore, our country should be thankful to foreigners efford and love. Thank you!

Let's look on the graph below. It shows the increasing immigration to Norway. In 2060, it is expected that one out of four citizens is an "immigrant". But it's hard to define when an immigrant becomes a Norwegian.

It's not a good idea to look back to the 1950s, when Norway was a monoculture of ethnical Norwegians, only to think of they as real Norwegians. Oslo is today multicultural. But people are scared of changes. Changes that they aren't scared of once they become a reality. Like immigration to Oslo.

Good night!